Current School: Illinois Fighting Illini

Offensive Style Metric History

SeasonSchoolOff. EfficiencyAssist%TO%Off. Rebound%FTA/FGA% Shots BlockedFouls Drawn%%Shots 3FG%Assisted 3FGs%Shots Mid-Range% Midrange Assisted%Shots at Rim%Assisted at Rim%Shots in Transition
2014Stephen F. Austin115.262.314.238.40.2869.631.00.36092.328.543.335.435.716.9
2015Stephen F. Austin115.265.417.537.90.3149.631.60.37092.423.850.939.640.221.1
2016Stephen F. Austin115.365.314.834.60.2537.429.00.36593.230.754.432.432.223.0
2017Oklahoma St.117.850.815.138.10.30210.828.50.35784.726.333.337.940.227.2
2018Illinois105.851.615.834.10.24512.128.80.36283.128.432.935.426.420.2
2019Illinois101.251.716.029.00.2079.726.10.37577.628.334.034.233.826.8

Defensive Style Metric History

SeasonSchoolDef. EfficiencyAssist%% of TOs Live-BallDef. Rebound%Opponent FTA/FGAFouls Committed%%Shots 3FG%Shots Mid-Range%Shots at Rim%Shots Dunks% of Shots in TransitionNon-Transition eFG%Tempo
2014Stephen F. Austin96.148.469.871.50.35231.90.26230.343.53.924.349.10%65.5
2015Stephen F. Austin94.447.864.770.70.34331.80.27925.446.64.024.248.20%68.0
2016Stephen F. Austin91.052.170.470.00.25829.60.31225.843.65.120.649.30%69.6
2017Oklahoma St.107.951.570.568.80.32530.40.34526.838.26.723.052.30%72.7
2018Illinois103.152.061.868.90.35131.80.34926.238.99.920.552.70%70.8
2019Illinois104.853.166.068.10.31229.70.35426.837.87.325.051.30%71.0

Brad Underwood Coaching Summary

Brad Underwood’s team was in the 74th percentile of teams in pace of play. Tempo is merely stylistic and descriptive, it carries no negative nor positive connotation. Faster paced teams are toward the top (higher percentile) and slower paced teams are toward the bottom (lower percentile).

All teams have a half-court offensive philosophy as not every offensive possession will be in a transitional situation. Brad Underwood had an offensive style in his latest coached season that was closest to being consistent with a Spread Motion offense. It does not necessarily mean that the coach followed this offensive orthodoxy, but stylistically was most similar to this style of play.

On the offensive end, Brad Underwood had a team that had an offense that was more-or-less balanced as far shot distribution is concerned.It is supported by the metrics in the tables above. When it came to distributing the ball and emphasis on ball movement or scoring off the dribble, the latest season’s metrics support the following:

  • From 3 point range, Relative non-emphasis on ball movement to set up three point shots.
  • From the mid-range, Above-average emphasis on ball movement to set up mid-range shots.
  • At the rim, Above-average emphasis on scoring at the rim off the dribble.

Defense much like offense, there is much diversity of thought as far as style of play. There are teams that have both full court and half-court defense and in the case of the latest season for Brad Underwood, Some Backcourt Pressure.

In the half-court, Brad Underwood featured a defensive footprint that was consistent with a team that sported a Man-to-Man. Its effectiveness is indicated by the defensive efficiency metric as seen in the above tables.
Back to Coaches