Current School: UC Davis Aggies

Offensive Style Metric History

SeasonSchoolOff. EfficiencyAssist%TO%Off. Rebound%FTA/FGA% Shots BlockedFouls Drawn%%Shots 3FG%Assisted 3FGs%Shots Mid-Range% Midrange Assisted%Shots at Rim%Assisted at Rim%Shots in Transition
2012UC Davis93.256.120.427.00.22411.524.30.40383.832.233.327.427.615.7
2013UC Davis105.558.618.526.40.2379.525.10.38587.529.226.532.432.421.2
2014UC Davis102.749.915.724.40.25810.627.90.40485.329.925.030.230.720.0
2015UC Davis111.154.818.628.50.2777.828.10.38780.632.032.729.030.214.5
2016UC Davis93.149.118.625.10.2219.028.20.28881.744.433.626.628.117.0
2017UC Davis98.952.817.628.90.2788.930.10.31686.934.437.634.134.916.7
2018UC Davis104.349.016.724.90.2829.329.90.31988.329.724.839.038.819.5
2019UC Davis96.551.017.721.50.2189.427.50.37091.924.723.037.539.618.0

Defensive Style Metric History

SeasonSchoolDef. EfficiencyAssist%% of TOs Live-BallDef. Rebound%Opponent FTA/FGAFouls Committed%%Shots 3FG%Shots Mid-Range%Shots at Rim%Shots Dunks% of Shots in TransitionNon-Transition eFG%Tempo
2012UC Davis111.861.764.660.50.24927.80.32831.635.86.819.951.40%66.6
2013UC Davis106.958.365.167.00.22325.60.35733.730.64.219.848.00%67.3
2014UC Davis113.857.660.065.00.28129.30.31833.735.25.018.553.70%66.6
2015UC Davis101.554.
2016UC Davis96.357.966.272.40.21626.40.37030.332.64.518.145.90%67.1
2017UC Davis98.153.956.472.50.22827.20.36825.837.73.520.748.00%70.2
2018UC Davis97.954.666.770.70.26829.00.37825.336.93.718.247.90%67.3
2019UC Davis100.852.163.772.30.26128.70.37727.734.

Jim Les Coaching Summary

Jim Les’s team was in the 20th percentile of teams in pace of play. Tempo is merely stylistic and descriptive, it carries no negative nor positive connotation. Faster paced teams are toward the top (higher percentile) and slower paced teams are toward the bottom (lower percentile).

All teams have a half-court offensive philosophy as not every offensive possession will be in a transitional situation. Jim Les had an offensive style in his latest coached season that was closest to being consistent with a Princeton Style offense. It does not necessarily mean that the coach followed this offensive orthodoxy, but stylistically was most similar to this style of play.

On the offensive end, Jim Les had a team that had an offense that was more-or-less balanced as far shot distribution is concerned.It is supported by the metrics in the tables above. When it came to distributing the ball and emphasis on ball movement or scoring off the dribble, the latest season’s metrics support the following:

  • From 3 point range, Strongly emphasized ball movement to set up three point shots.
  • From the mid-range, Below-average emphasis on ball movement to set up mid-range shots.
  • At the rim, Above-average emphasis on scoring at the rim on cuts to the basket.

Defense much like offense, there is much diversity of thought as far as style of play. There are teams that have both full court and half-court defense and in the case of the latest season for Jim Les, Some Backcourt Pressure.

In the half-court, Jim Les featured a defensive footprint that was consistent with a team that sported a Man-to-Man. Its effectiveness is indicated by the defensive efficiency metric as seen in the above tables.
Back to Coaches